Kathie A. from Nedrow, NY on 05/09/2009 at 03:57 PM MT
totally fucking killed that house with vynal
/ 3 of 7 Liked this Comment
linda L. from Geneseo, IL on 05/10/2009 at 02:39 PM MT
I liked it better on the before picture but both are nice.
/ 1 of 3 Liked this Comment
Aimee S. from South Windsor, CT on 05/13/2009 at 06:19 AM MT
Looks awful now. Like a nursing home or condo complex...
/ 1 of 2 Liked this Comment
Anthony B. from Newark, NJ on 05/13/2009 at 08:05 AM MT
They should of left it alone. That house looked beautiful before & now it looks horrible.
/ 0 of 1 Liked this Comment
David B. from Chicago, IL on 05/13/2009 at 08:20 AM MT
They should have done the same type/color siding on the first house. The siding they used really cheapens the look of the house. The second house...well it looks better that it did before but its an ugly house.
/ Did you like this comment?
Barbara S. from Joliet, IL on 05/13/2009 at 08:53 AM MT
I don't like either of the houses' after the redo.
/ Did you like this comment?
Paula W. from Stone Mountain, GA on 05/13/2009 at 02:08 PM MT
I liked the first house before the change. I'm not sure why they thought it needed to be changed; now it looks like they need to update the house.
Although the second house looks better, it's still not a top notch job to me. It looks like it was done on a very, very small budget.
/ 2 of 2 Liked this Comment
Cindy P. from Stanford, KY on 06/25/2009 at 11:20 AM MT
I agree with the other comments. In both cases, the "after" version was not much of an improvement.
/ Did you like this comment?
Maryann F. from Ely, NV on 10/04/2009 at 07:05 PM MT
I agree with the rest. I think it was the house being so ugly.